Answer questions Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 500 words - 12

Answer questions - Essay Example These standards remain the bedrock of current administration hypothesis; late scientists have reï ¬ ned or created them to suit present day conditions and some portion of it is the utilization of data framework to make the management’s five exercises to be increasingly effective. These administration exercises include successful treatment of data and this is the place compelling data frameworks come in supportive. For instance, in playing out the controlling part of the executives, it would include taking care of different arrangement of data to check if certain measures are met underway, deals or different business work. Data framework will assist me with getting this data through a system and dealing with this monstrous measure of data will be simpler using data programming which would have been in any case relentless without the assistance of data framework. This makes me productive and ready to all the more successfully at a lesser time. Rules for its moral utilize anyway should be built up. Private data that identifies with the representative or data that doesn't identify with the activity must not be unveiled or utilized for other reason other than what it is expected. Innovation can be useful however can likewise be dangerous on the off chance that it isn't guided by moral thought. HTML represents Hypertext Markup Language. Tim Berners-Lee, an architect from CERN initially built up the possibility of HTML. The possibility of HTML came out of Berner-Lee’s dissatisfaction of signing on to various PCs just to get the data he required. He pondered that there must be a superior method to get a lot of data from various PCs which conceived an offspring the possibility of HTML. So the first idea of HTML was a hyper-text framework that associates organizing innovation and conventions to share data between PCs. From that point on, it later created to turn into the premise and crucial language of the internet or web (www.landofcode.com). It began with its

Wars of religion and consolidation in France

There were explicit timeframes in the memorable time of France when religion was a genuine issue for its residents. France was involved by the war on religion during very nearly four decades since 1562 up to 1598. There were three incredible times of the war which were held during 1562 †1576 (the initial segment of the war), 1572 †1588 (wars of religion and the Saint Bartholomew slaughter), and 1588 †1598 (wars of religion and the Edict of Nantes).Advertising We will compose a custom article test on Wars of religion and solidification in France explicitly for you for just $16.05 $11/page Learn More The fundamental powers in this war of religions were the Protestants, the Huguenots, the Catholics, who fought for control in France. Religion had never been a fundamental political instrument until 1562? In any case, during the further 40 years religion became significant factor for policy centered issues. Battling for mastery, rulers did utilized religion as the instrument yet not as the last motivation behind the wars, the principle reasons of which were the budgetary, auxiliary and character shortcomings of the government, factional contention between the significant groups of France who upheld distinctive strict admissions, and financial downturn. Appearance family, the Bourbons and the Montmorency-Chatillons were three families which battled for the mastery in the nation. As indicated by the heredity, Catherine de Medici took the seat and her Catholic perspectives were bolstered by the Guise family who were nor happy with the expansion of the Protestants impact and drove a military against a protestant church in Champagne. Catherine de Medici was keen on keeping up balance between these two religions, in any case, it was not in light of a legitimate concern for Guise family who needed to pick up the force in the nation. Be that as it may, Catherine de Medici figured out how to discover the harmony among Catholics and Protestants in 1570, in any c ase, the war was continued in 1572 by executing a few thousand Huguenots in Paris. In this way, the third religion was engaged with the war. The wars between such powers as Protestants, Catholics and Huguenots finished in 158 when â€Å"the Edict of Nantes conceded opportunity of love to the entire of France† (Wars of Religion in France). The mark of the Treaty of Vervins among France and Spain totally completed the wars of religion in the nation. Attempting to break down the genuine purposes behind the wars, clearly e first war of religion was brought about by the political resistance of the incredible powers in the nation. The second war of religion more reminded the national revolt for freedom and just the third war might be considered as a genuine war of religion as at that point the showdown between various religions was truly destroying and something ought to be done to adjust those (Kingdon 170).Advertising Looking for paper on history? How about we check whether we ca n support you! Get your first paper with 15% OFF Learn More The last phase of the religions war was incited by the authorization for Protestants to follow their strict groups wherever in France aside from Paris. Numerous sides in the nation were disappointed with the choices. Holt Concludes that â€Å"the genuine heritage of the French Wars of religion, in any case, was that this talk of absolutism existed together with the expanded social polarization among rich and poor that came about because of the common wars themselves† (Holt 222). Attempting to rethink the occasions which occurred in France during the wars of religion, it is conceivable to reason that the protracted war period was crated by the rulers and their failure to keep up request in the general public. Battling for the force and the seat, rulers disregarded individuals and their needs. The wars of religion were conceivable just when the crown was shared and one political force won (Knecht 90). This case bolster s once again the possibility that religion is normally utilized as the force for administering individuals in close to home political games. Thinking about the aftereffect of the wars, a few people may believe that the Edict of Nantes and the Treaty of Vervins figured out how to take care of the strict issues. In any case, this isn't generally right as these measures were taken to stop dynamic war activities (as the political forces didn't require this instrument in their fight any more) and reestablish the attack of Catholic thoughts through the nation. In this manner, it might be presumed that the wars of religion in France were only the political instrument in hands of rulers. Attempting to fathom individual issues, the amazing groups of France showed up before the decision of the battling technique. Some extra issues which might be considered as the pushing parts of the undertaking simply bolstered the longing of the ground-breaking families to utilize religion as the methods fo r making individuals propelled by the thought and to battle for the interests of a solid political force. It ought to be expressed that strict issues consistently exist and there is no nation where the issue of religion isn't put at edge, in any case, a few governments figure out how to keep up balance between various religions in the nation to ensure that all residents stay fulfilled, However, on the off chance that one wants to utilize religion as the instrument, he/she can generally do it being propelled by the incredible case of the wars of religion in France between 1562-1598. Works Cited Holt, Mack P. The French Wars of Religion, 1562-1629, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2005. Print. Kingdon, Robert McCune. Geneva and the Consolidation of the French Protestant Movement, 1564-1572: A Contribution to the History of Congregationalism, Presbyterianism and Calvinist Resistance Theory. New York: Librairie Droz, 1967. Print.Advertising We will compose a custom article test on Wars of religion and union in France explicitly for you for just $16.05 $11/page Learn More Knecht, Robert. The French Religious Wars 1562-1598. New York: Osprey Publishing, 2002. Print. â€Å"Wars of Religion in France.† France This Way, 2012, web, 11 Sept. 2012, https://www.francethisway.com/history/warsofreligion-a.php This article on Wars of religion and combination in France was composed and put together by client Sasha Carroll to help you with your own investigations. You are allowed to utilize it for research and reference purposes so as to compose your own paper; be that as it may, you should refer to it appropriately. You can give your paper here.

Lolita, Estella, Lana, and Me

Lolita, Estella, Lana, and Me “This is probably way too personal,” is a thing I think quite frequently when writing for the internet. “You never know who might be reading it.” Which is both a good thing and a bad thing, really, because sure, someone it’s vaguely about could be reading itbut so could someone who feels it’s about them, and isn’t that much more important? I think it is, so here I am, about to tell you stuff about my life that I really don’t talk about, only writewritewrite. Remember the first time you read something that reminded you of something else you’d read? It was long before you learned the word intertextuality, I’m sure (at least, it was for me). For me, it was the same moment I realized that I had read enough that such a thing could finally happen. I mean, okay, in my case I was 13 and it was the title of Tori Amos’s Boys for Pele  that reminded  me of a Sweet Valley Twins Super Edition called The Unicorns Go Hawaiian; still, I felt pretty cool because I had learned from the book that Pele was a volcano goddess and understood on a very basic level what Boys for Pele meant. The title, not the album; I was waaaayyy too young for that album when I bought it, thank goddess, or I might not have loved it as hard as I did. Anyway. On to the personal. When I first read Lolita, I was 21. When I first read Great Expectations, I was 16. When I first heard Lana Del Rey, I was 28. I’m far from a Lana fangirl, but  I feel like I get her persona because to me, it’s a character that couldn’t exist without Lolita and Estella. She became the link between the Nabokov, the Dickens, and my own history, somehow; now I can’t separate her from them. It’s just math, really: Lolita + Estella + Lana = me, for a highly formative five-year period of my life. I should be very thankful that it’s not me now at all, now that I’m happily married and just sitting around crocheting and reading books and hiding from excitement as best I can; not me now, finally feeling healed and alive and strong instead of sad and broken and Interestingâ„¢. I cringe now when I think about being 16, being 21, and the time in between when I was so busy playing characters that I’m only just now getting around to processing what really happene d (in writing of course, the way I process everything). I cringe, and I write, and I put it on the internet. *** As a survivor of a very specific type of psychological and physical violence from a young age until a slightly less-young age, I adopted the persona of a girl who could take it. I stood up and fought back, but never enough to deter the perpetrators from striking again. And again. And again. Bruised and sore, I was, but never ever willing to back down from a fight. I even convinced myself that I provoked the fights just to prove how tough I was. Tough as nails, rough as pine bark. In control, in other words. But no: nice, sugar and spice, a powder puff, a teary-eyed  puddlebut only in private. When I first read Lolita, I intentionally read her as the same, to console myself, to lift myself up and share a pedestal with this idealized-but-victimized young girl. That’s what my 21-year-old self needed, flooded as I was with memories I had no idea what to do with; flooded as I had been for five fucking years with all the awfulness I’d repressed. I needed to be idealized, and had been; we’ll get to that. I needed a pedestal because how else could I be sure everyone was looking at me, but only at the carefully-constructed version I wanted them to see. Let’s go back, shall we, even further? When I was 16, I liked a guy. I can’t call him a boy, really, because he was much older, but “man” doesn’t feel right either. I can’t call it like, really, because it turned much bigger and darker. He gave me Wuthering Heights. From there, I went to Jane Eyre and promptly to Dickens. Of course, it helped me along that path when, in 1998, Tori Amos had a song on the soundtrack to the Ethan Hawke/Gwyneth Paltrow abomination  adaptation of Great Expectations. (I actually like that film just fine, but I know I’m not really supposed to.) I paraded myself in front of this guy as much as I could. I preened. I acted out, but only when he was looking. I faked sending flirtatious AOL IMs (it was the late 90s) “to the wrong person, oops, sorry!” You know, to test the water. I wanted him to desire me, to think me wise beyond my years, an old soul, so much smarter than he was at my ageall those things older men should never say to teenage girls but always do anyway. Still, those words were all I was hungry for, and when I finally got them, mere days (okay, nights) shy of my eighteenth birthday, I had no idea what to do with them. When he invited me to his house, I pulled back. This is when he called me Estella for the first time, and I thought that actually, pulling back was showing him I was in control. It implied that he had invested something in me, maybe just lust and maybe a hefty dose of perversity, and that I had the ability to refuse him what he wanted (sex) when I realized he wasn’t going to reciprocate in the way I wanted him to (with love). I needn’t reveal more to get my point across. I hope he doesn’t read this and know himself immediately. I hope he does. That whole era of my life, those two years and the three-yes-three it took to move on, feels like something out of a book. Actually, it is technically  in a book because I wrote literally hundreds of poems about it all, and more. I was prepared in a couple of unique ways, at least, to accept the character Lana Del Rey embodies in her songs. It’s been argued that she glorifies violence against women, that she’s the ultimate poseur, that she plain sucks, and so on. I don’t really keep up with her outside of her music, honestly, so I don’t have opinions on those things. (As a semi-ranty aside, I will say that, while I know she has distanced herself from feminism, it actually hurts rather than helps when other women tear her down for that. We should be asking what feminism is doing wrong that alienates women like her.) All I know is that so many of Lana’s lyrics perfectly narrate my feelings for The Guy. He wasn’t as old as Humbert, and he wasn’t rich like a skeezy old man  in a LDR song, but I’m a little shocked he didn’t quote “light of my life, fire of my loins” at me at some point. The more damaged I painted myself to be, the more interested he became. As if all my past experiences led to me being just exactlywhat?desperate unhinged appealingly crazy enough to give him what he wanted. I persisted; I held back. I took so I could refuse to give. When  Lana Del Rey released Ultraviolence earlier this year, immediately the play on words struck me: Is she trying to talk about the level of violence that’s there but invisible, like ultraviolet light? Verbal abuse. Sexual coercion without physical force. Psychological torture. Everything unnameable and evil that never leaves a bruise, never brings blood, never mars the surface. She sings “he hit me and it felt like a kiss,” sounding disturbingly disaffected, in the voice of a woman who is as accustomed to violence as other women are to affection. She tells herself a man is shitty to her because “I’m pretty when I cry.” She is as trapped as Lolita, as disillusioned as Estella. She’s a link between the two that makes sense to me because of my strained relationship with them both. *** Hi, I’m an open book built of other books, of music and poetry, and especially of the too-personal, rambling essays I’m fond of putting on the internet. I want to know whose words you’re made of, so tell me in the comments.